The One Without an Anchor

One legal question that has renewed interest over the past few years is “what is a security?” Crypto lovers will tell you that their stuff is not securities. It all goes back to the definition of “security” and the less conventional term within that definition of “investment contract.” The Howey test focuses on that term within the definition.

The case against Anchor State Capital (formerly known as Anchor State Investments) and Anchor State Properties caught my attention as an alleged Ponzi scheme in Massachusetts. The promoter, Christopher Aubin is accused of taking investor money and not actually investing all of it. It seems like run of the mill fraud. Obviously, Mr. Aubin has not had an opportunity to defend himself against the accusations.

Was he selling securities? The SEC complaint states that the investments involved slightly different forms called “Investment Contracts,” “Partner Contracts,” or “Real Estate Partner Contracts.” I’m going to guess that at least one of those forms is going to be considered a security.

Sources:

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.