SEC News

What Do You Get For Cooperation with the SEC?

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010 at 8:00 am
Rebecca Files

More likely to get sanctioned. Reduction of $30.3 million in penalties when you initiate your own investigation. Reduction of $609,000 in company penalties for each week earlier the statement is announced the public. Reduction of $112,000 in personal penalties for each week earlier the statement is announced the public. We in the compliance field have… » Read More

SEC is Changing Form ADV

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010 at 8:00 am

The SEC is trying to improve Form ADV. I wonder if it takes into account the new registration standards under the Dodd-Frank Act or whether they will need to make another to recognize the new law. From the SEC press Release SEC Approves Disclosure Form Changes to Provide Investors Greater Information About Their Investment Advisers:… » Read More

Goldman Settles; Fabulous Fab is Left on His Own

Friday, July 16th, 2010 at 9:51 am

Goldman Sachs settled with the Securities and Exchange Commission. That’s not a surprise. Goldman did not want to litigate this action. It wanted it to go away. As a shareholder in Goldman, I wanted it to go away. It seems others did also. GS stock price opened at $138.50 on Thursday morning. It opened at… » Read More

SEC Votes on Pay to Play

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010 at 10:48 am

At Wednesday’s Open Meeting the Securities and Exchange Commission took up the discussion of their proposed rules on pay-to-play for investment advisers. The proposal is a new Rule 206 (4)-5 under the Investment Advisers Act. The Commission voted unanimously to adopt the rule. The rule will have three main prongs: Two Year Time-Out An investment… » Read More

SEC’s Rule on Pay to Play is Coming

Friday, June 25th, 2010 at 10:07 am

It’s been almost a year, but it looks like the SEC is ready to issue its rule on political contributions by investment advisers. They announced the subject matter for the Wednesday June 30 10:00 am open meeting: The Commission will consider whether to adopt a new rule and related rule amendments under the Investment Advisers… » Read More

Why Is It Called a “Wells Notice”?

Monday, June 14th, 2010 at 8:00 am

In 1972, SEC Chairman William J. Casey appointed a committee to review and evaluate the Commission’s enforcement policies and practices. Chairman Casey appointed John A. Wells, a lawyer at Royall, Koegel & Wells in New York, to the committee. He also added and former SEC Chairmen Manny Cohen and Ralph Demmler.  Chairman Casey asked Jack… » Read More

SEC’s Mickey Mouse Sting Operation

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010 at 8:00 am

Maybe this would have worked last year. But traders are probably a little nervous when it comes to buying inside information since the Galleon insider trading case. Hedge funds are now well aware that the SEC and FBI are willing to use a broader range of investigation techniques including wire taps and undercover agents. That’s… » Read More

The SEC’s Agenda: Enforcement and Regulatory Priorities

Monday, May 24th, 2010 at 9:22 am

Compliance week starts off with a Keynote speech from U.S. SEC Commissioner Luis A. Aguilar, dubbed “The Enforcement Commissioner” by Compliance Week in March 2009, will provide an update on SEC’s enforcement developments and priorities, including topics such as penalty guidelines and the SEC’s streamlining of the formal order process. Commissioner Aguilar will also explore… » Read More

SEC Censure for Failing to Conduct Due Diligence

Thursday, May 13th, 2010 at 8:00 am

The SEC censured and fined an investment adviser for due diligence lapses. Yosemite Capital Management, LLC and its managing director, Paul H. Heckler, got a wrist slap for failing to disclose to clients that they had encountered substantial problems when attempting to perform the due diligence. The big problem is that Yosemite had made a… » Read More

SEC Attacks the Rating Agencies

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010 at 8:00 am

The SEC took its first swing at the failure of credit rating agencies by serving a Wells Notice on Moody’s Investor Service. At issue, according to the Moody’s filing, is the determination in 2007 that members of one of its European rating committees “engaged in conduct contrary to Moody’s Code of Professional Conduct.”  Members of… » Read More