I previously posted on the Midland Grange case [Delaware Imposing Same Fiduciary Duty on Officers as Directors] where the Delaware Chancery Court imposed the same obligations on officers as directors, including the duty of loyalty and the duty of care. In Miller v. McDonald, et al., ( D. Del., Bankr., April 9, 2008), the Bankruptcy Court [...]
Tag Archives: Caremark
The Implications of Stone v. Ritter
on November 13, 2008 in Compliance Programs
In 1996, Delaware’s Court of Chancery stated in the Caremark case that a director’s duty of good faith includes a duty to attempt to assure that a corporate information and reporting system exists, and that failure to do so may, under some circumstances, render a director liable for losses caused by the illegal conduct of [...]
Recent Stories
- Blogoversary
- Compliance Bits and Pieces for February 10
- Proposed FATCA Regulations Released
- New Anti-Money Laundering Requirements for Non-Bank Mortgage Lenders and Originators
- Crowdsourcing the Crowdfunding Exemption
- Compliance, the Middle-Finger Malfunction, and the Reluctant Touchdown
- Compliance Bits and Pieces for February 3
- Margin Call
- Will Private Equity Fund Managers Get a Registration Exemption?
- Changes Coming With Anti-Money Laundering Requirements
About
Compliance Building is published by Doug Cornelius, focusing on compliance and ethical issues for private equity real estate companies. Read more in About.
Social Media
My social media policies database is available to you.


Affilate
This website uses the Canvas Wordpress theme from WooThemes. (affiliate link)






