Presidential Campaign Season and the SEC’s Pay-to-Play Rule

the great seal fo the state of iowa

With the recent Iowa Straw Poll, the presidential campaign season is getting into full gear. That also means that campaign fundraising is in full gear. I thought it would be useful to apply the SEC’s new Pay-to-play for Investment Advisors to the crop of presidential contenders.

Under SEC Rule 206(4)-5, investment advisors are limited in their ability to give campaign contributions to political candidates who can directly or indirectly influence the hiring of an investment advisor by a government-sponsored investment entity. A campaign contribution in violation of the rule means the investment advisor can not collect fees from the applicable government-sponsored investor for two years. The rule applies to registered investment advisors and fund managers that had been exempt under the now-repealed, private fund manager exemption.

The president of the United States is not an office that can directly or indirectly influence the hiring of an investment advisor, so that position is not one that is limited by the SEC Rule. However, you also need to look at the candidate’s current office to see if that position is one that is limited.

That means campaign contributions to the incumbent president, Barack Obama, are not limited by the rule. Some of his potential competitors are limited.

  1. Michele Bachmann. Her current office in the US House of Representatives is not limited by the rule.
  2. Ron Paul. His current office in the US House of Representatives is not limited by the rule.
  3. Tim Pawlenty. As Governor of Minnesota, contributions to his campaign would have been limited had he still been in office. He finished his term on January 3, 2011, which pre-dates the March 13, 2011 effective date of the rule.
  4. Rick Santorum. He does not currently hold a political office and is therefore not limited by the rule.
  5. Herman Cain. He does not currently hold a political office and is therefore not limited by the rule.
  6. Rick Perry. As the current Governor of Texas, he appoints trustees to the
  7. Mitt Romney. He does not currently hold a political office and is therefore not limited by the rule.
  8. Newt Gingrich. He does not currently hold a political office and is therefore not limited by the rule.
  9. Jon Huntsman. He does not currently hold a political office and is therefore not limited by the rule.
  10. Thaddeus McCotter. His current office in the US House of Representatives is not limited by the rule.

Registered Investment Advisors, private fund managers getting ready to register with Securities and Exchange Commission, and their employees need to be very cautious about making contributions to Governor Perry if they have a Texas state sponsored fund as a client or investor, or hope to have one as a client or investor in the next two years.

The rule also applies to placement agents. They must either be a registered investment advisor subject to SEC Rule 206(4)-5 or a municipal adviser subject to MSRB Rule G-42.

It is very obvious that SEC Rule 206(4)-5 can cause significant distortions in the political campaign.

Sources:

,

6 Responses to Presidential Campaign Season and the SEC’s Pay-to-Play Rule

  1. Meredith September 22, 2011 at 6:45 pm #

    Where does the SEC state that the US House of Representatives are not covered by Rule 206(4)-5? Thank you.

    • Doug Cornelius September 23, 2011 at 7:42 am #

      A congressman cannot:

      directly or indirectly influence the hiring of an investment adviser, or

      appoint a person who can directly or indirectly influence the hiring of an investment adviser.

      for federal government sponsored funds since they do not commit funds to investment advisers or private funds. Social security is invested in Treasury notes.

      So donations to incumbent members of congress are not limited by the rule. However, if the candidate is not an incumbent, you need to look at their current office (if they hold one).

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. The Vice President and SEC’s Pay to Play Rule – Compliance Building - September 11, 2012

    [...] in the Republican contest for the nomination, Rick Perry was on the watch list under Rule 206(4)-5. Since he could directly or indirectly control several state pension funds in the State of Texas, [...]

  2. Some Relief for a Fund Manager Under the Political Contributions Rule | Compliance Building - November 25, 2013

    […] Thankfully, the SEC is showing some relief from this oppressive rule that distorts political campaigns. Mr. Yoseloff could have given the $2500 to Sherrod Brown, the other candidate in the election, and there would have been no problem. In the 2012 republican presidential primaries, of the 10 candidates only Rick Perry was limited by t…. […]

  3. Do SEC and MSRB Pay-to-Play Rules Scare Off Donations to Federal Candidates? | Pay to Play Law Blog - April 2, 2014

    […] (check out page 43 of the SEC’s link above if you don’t believe me). As we, and others, have pointed out previously, this rule does not apply to contributions to sitting federal […]

  4. Can Investment Advisors, Private Fund Managers, and their Employees Contribute to Governor Perry? | Pay to Play Law Blog - April 2, 2014

    […] Compliance Building blog (Presidential Campaign Season and the SEC’s Pay-to-Play Rule) has just posted an excellent analysis of the issue. I highly recommend you check it […]

Leave a Reply