<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Leak is not Protected as a SOX Whistleblower</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2010/02/17/media-leak-is-not-protected-as-a-sox-whistleblower/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2010/02/17/media-leak-is-not-protected-as-a-sox-whistleblower/</link>
	<description>Doug Cornelius on compliance and business ethics for private equity real estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:56:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Compliance Building Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2010/02/17/media-leak-is-not-protected-as-a-sox-whistleblower/comment-page-1/#comment-4799</link>
		<dc:creator>Compliance Building Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=6086#comment-4799</guid>
		<description>[...] Media Leak is not Protected as a SOX Whistleblower [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Media Leak is not Protected as a SOX Whistleblower [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2010/02/17/media-leak-is-not-protected-as-a-sox-whistleblower/comment-page-1/#comment-4712</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=6086#comment-4712</guid>
		<description>Matt -

I think it only takes one bad guest to ruin this party. You can get fired for violating the media disclosure policy, but not for the Congressional disclosure. That&#039;s still fired. 

If they gave it to the Congressman who then leaked it to the press? I don&#039;t know.

The same is true with Attorney-Client privilege. If you CC your auditors on a letter/email to your attorney, that message is no longer subject to privilege. http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/01/20/draft-sec-filings-can-be-protected-from-discovery/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt -</p>
<p>I think it only takes one bad guest to ruin this party. You can get fired for violating the media disclosure policy, but not for the Congressional disclosure. That&#8217;s still fired. </p>
<p>If they gave it to the Congressman who then leaked it to the press? I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>The same is true with Attorney-Client privilege. If you CC your auditors on a letter/email to your attorney, that message is no longer subject to privilege. <a href="http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/01/20/draft-sec-filings-can-be-protected-from-discovery/" rel="nofollow">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/01/20/draft-sec-filings-can-be-protected-from-discovery/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2010/02/17/media-leak-is-not-protected-as-a-sox-whistleblower/comment-page-1/#comment-4702</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=6086#comment-4702</guid>
		<description>So let&#039;s say our whistleblowers CC&#039;ed a member of Congress at the same time they emailed documents to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer-- would that have provided protection? In other words, in an era of simultaneous multiple disclosures, could Section 806 protect you for one disclosure but not another? 

&lt;em&gt;Disclosure: I am a reporter. I also don&#039;t like Seattle.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let&#8217;s say our whistleblowers CC&#8217;ed a member of Congress at the same time they emailed documents to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer&#8211; would that have provided protection? In other words, in an era of simultaneous multiple disclosures, could Section 806 protect you for one disclosure but not another? </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I am a reporter. I also don&#8217;t like Seattle.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

