<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Draft SEC Strategic Plan for 2010-2015</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/10/08/draft-sec-strategic-plan-for-2010-2015/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/10/08/draft-sec-strategic-plan-for-2010-2015/</link>
	<description>Doug Cornelius on compliance and business ethics for private equity real estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:56:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valuable Internet Information &#187; Draft SEC Strategic Plan for 2010-2015 &#124; Compliance Building</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/10/08/draft-sec-strategic-plan-for-2010-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>Valuable Internet Information &#187; Draft SEC Strategic Plan for 2010-2015 &#124; Compliance Building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=4538#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally posted here:  Draft SEC Strategic Plan for 2010-2015 &#124; Compliance Building [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally posted here:  Draft SEC Strategic Plan for 2010-2015 | Compliance Building [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/10/08/draft-sec-strategic-plan-for-2010-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-2047</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=4538#comment-2047</guid>
		<description>Jeff - 

As they point out in the discussion of Strategic Goal 1, they want to stop the next Madoff. 

Inevitably, with a focus on IAs, BDs and private investments, the next problem will come from public companies or investment companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff &#8211; </p>
<p>As they point out in the discussion of Strategic Goal 1, they want to stop the next Madoff. </p>
<p>Inevitably, with a focus on IAs, BDs and private investments, the next problem will come from public companies or investment companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kaplan</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/10/08/draft-sec-strategic-plan-for-2010-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-2046</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Kaplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=4538#comment-2046</guid>
		<description>Doug, Interesting to see that while the SEC recognizes that it should promote compliance programs both among regulated entities and public companies (pp 10-11) all the performance metrics for this part of the plan are related to the former.  This is unfortunate because public company compliance programs are obviously important as well - but it is consistent with the SEC&#039;s track record to date in this area. Hopefully, they will receive comments encouraging them to do more to promote public company compliance programs, too - particularly by crediting such programs (under the policy established by the Seaboard case) in a more public way than they presently do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, Interesting to see that while the SEC recognizes that it should promote compliance programs both among regulated entities and public companies (pp 10-11) all the performance metrics for this part of the plan are related to the former.  This is unfortunate because public company compliance programs are obviously important as well &#8211; but it is consistent with the SEC&#8217;s track record to date in this area. Hopefully, they will receive comments encouraging them to do more to promote public company compliance programs, too &#8211; particularly by crediting such programs (under the policy established by the Seaboard case) in a more public way than they presently do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

