<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Massachusetts Amends Strict Data Privacy Law (Again)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/08/18/massachusetts-amends-strict-data-privacy-law-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/08/18/massachusetts-amends-strict-data-privacy-law-again/</link>
	<description>Doug Cornelius on compliance and business ethics for private equity real estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:56:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/08/18/massachusetts-amends-strict-data-privacy-law-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5145</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=3983#comment-5145</guid>
		<description>I assume that you have the social security numbers for those Massachusetts residents. That means it applies to you and that information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that you have the social security numbers for those Massachusetts residents. That means it applies to you and that information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/08/18/massachusetts-amends-strict-data-privacy-law-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5144</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=3983#comment-5144</guid>
		<description>Does this law affect Vermont businesses with Mass residents?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this law affect Vermont businesses with Mass residents?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/08/18/massachusetts-amends-strict-data-privacy-law-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5143</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=3983#comment-5143</guid>
		<description>Does this law apply to Vermont businesses who employee Massachusetts residents?

Thank you.
Jennifer LoCascio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this law apply to Vermont businesses who employee Massachusetts residents?</p>
<p>Thank you.<br />
Jennifer LoCascio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Today is the Deadline for the Massachusetts Data Privacy Law &#124; Compliance Building</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/08/18/massachusetts-amends-strict-data-privacy-law-again/comment-page-1/#comment-4912</link>
		<dc:creator>Today is the Deadline for the Massachusetts Data Privacy Law &#124; Compliance Building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=3983#comment-4912</guid>
		<description>[...] Massachusetts Amends Strict Data Privacy Law (Again) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Massachusetts Amends Strict Data Privacy Law (Again) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/08/18/massachusetts-amends-strict-data-privacy-law-again/comment-page-1/#comment-4348</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=3983#comment-4348</guid>
		<description>Hi Patrick,

It&#039;s Brian Wheeler from WBZNewsRadio Radio in Boston. I&#039;d like to ask you a few questions about this law an your experience in compliance assistance. You can reach me at 617-787-7591.

Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patrick,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s Brian Wheeler from WBZNewsRadio Radio in Boston. I&#8217;d like to ask you a few questions about this law an your experience in compliance assistance. You can reach me at 617-787-7591.</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Massachusetts Amends Its Strict Data Privacy Law (Yet, Again) &#124; Compliance Building</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/08/18/massachusetts-amends-strict-data-privacy-law-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>Massachusetts Amends Its Strict Data Privacy Law (Yet, Again) &#124; Compliance Building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=3983#comment-2506</guid>
		<description>[...] Massachusetts Amends Strict Data Privacy Law (Again) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Massachusetts Amends Strict Data Privacy Law (Again) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Engelman</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/08/18/massachusetts-amends-strict-data-privacy-law-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Engelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=3983#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>One omission from their FAQ on the changes is the fact that the 3rd party contract requirement (which had been removed in an earlier revision) has been re-added -- this basically says that any time a third party has access to personal information, that third party must be contractually obligated to protect that information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One omission from their FAQ on the changes is the fact that the 3rd party contract requirement (which had been removed in an earlier revision) has been re-added &#8212; this basically says that any time a third party has access to personal information, that third party must be contractually obligated to protect that information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

