Comments on: Compliance for Enterprise 2.0 at Lockheed Martin http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/06/25/compliance-for-enterprise-2-0-at-lockheed-martin/ Doug Cornelius on compliance and business ethics for private equity real estate Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:56:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Just another assessment of the E 2.O Conference: How Beautiful it is, and How Easily it can be Broken « Fredzimny’s CCCCC Blog http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/06/25/compliance-for-enterprise-2-0-at-lockheed-martin/comment-page-1/#comment-1241 Just another assessment of the E 2.O Conference: How Beautiful it is, and How Easily it can be Broken « Fredzimny’s CCCCC Blog Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:23 +0000 http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=3411#comment-1241 [...] main contribution was to interview Shawn Dawlin and Chris Keohane, two of the leaders of Lockheed Martin’s highly successful E2.0 deployment. The Lockheeders came [...] [...] main contribution was to interview Shawn Dawlin and Chris Keohane, two of the leaders of Lockheed Martin’s highly successful E2.0 deployment. The Lockheeders came [...]

]]> By: How Beautiful it is, and How Easily it can be Broken : Andrew McAfee’s Blog http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/06/25/compliance-for-enterprise-2-0-at-lockheed-martin/comment-page-1/#comment-1174 How Beautiful it is, and How Easily it can be Broken : Andrew McAfee’s Blog Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:28:24 +0000 http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=3411#comment-1174 [...] main contribution was to interview Shawn Dawlin and Chris Keohane, two of the leaders of Lockheed Martin’s highly successful E2.0 deployment. The Lockheeders [...] [...] main contribution was to interview Shawn Dawlin and Chris Keohane, two of the leaders of Lockheed Martin’s highly successful E2.0 deployment. The Lockheeders [...]

]]> By: Doug Cornelius http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/06/25/compliance-for-enterprise-2-0-at-lockheed-martin/comment-page-1/#comment-1162 Doug Cornelius Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:10:58 +0000 http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=3411#comment-1162 Chris - It sounds like process problem. You don't want to put up crap. But you do want some rough information to go up so that you can get input earlier in the process. My personal strategy was just to put "DRAFT" at the top of the wiki page. Chris -

It sounds like process problem. You don’t want to put up crap. But you do want some rough information to go up so that you can get input earlier in the process.

My personal strategy was just to put “DRAFT” at the top of the wiki page.

]]> By: Doug Cornelius http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/06/25/compliance-for-enterprise-2-0-at-lockheed-martin/comment-page-1/#comment-1161 Doug Cornelius Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:07:47 +0000 http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=3411#comment-1161 Mary - I loved your post on silos. I came to realize that throughout our eduction we are taught to work alone. (Sharing is cheating in school.) Then the tools we are given encourage us to save all of our stuff in silos. Too many of the technology tools encourage silos of information. Mary -

I loved your post on silos. I came to realize that throughout our eduction we are taught to work alone. (Sharing is cheating in school.) Then the tools we are given encourage us to save all of our stuff in silos. Too many of the technology tools encourage silos of information.

]]> By: Chris Yeh http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/06/25/compliance-for-enterprise-2-0-at-lockheed-martin/comment-page-1/#comment-1156 Chris Yeh Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:38:31 +0000 http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=3411#comment-1156 One of the things we've heard from our legal customers is that Associates and younger attorneys are reluctant to participate, because they're afraid that showing work-in-progress will impact their reputation in the firm. What do you think folks should do about that? One of the things we’ve heard from our legal customers is that Associates and younger attorneys are reluctant to participate, because they’re afraid that showing work-in-progress will impact their reputation in the firm. What do you think folks should do about that?

]]> By: Mary Abraham http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/06/25/compliance-for-enterprise-2-0-at-lockheed-martin/comment-page-1/#comment-1155 Mary Abraham Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:59:01 +0000 http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=3411#comment-1155 Thanks for a great discussion of this session, Doug. The work they've done at Lockheed Martin is very instructive for those of us in regulated or security-conscious industries. As for silos, they are a persistent problem caused by technology design and compounded by human nature. Breaking down silos takes very intentional work on the part of knowledge managers and IT managers. For a further discussion of silos, see my post on this issue: http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/06/fighting-the-farmers.html - Mary Thanks for a great discussion of this session, Doug. The work they’ve done at Lockheed Martin is very instructive for those of us in regulated or security-conscious industries.

As for silos, they are a persistent problem caused by technology design and compounded by human nature. Breaking down silos takes very intentional work on the part of knowledge managers and IT managers. For a further discussion of silos, see my post on this issue: http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/06/fighting-the-farmers.html

- Mary

]]>