<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Martindale-Hubbell Connected &#8211; My Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/03/21/martindale-hubble-connected-my-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/03/21/martindale-hubble-connected-my-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Doug Cornelius on compliance and business ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:51:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beth Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/03/21/martindale-hubble-connected-my-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-2871</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=1960#comment-2871</guid>
		<description>I used the Martindale-Hubble reputation as the Gold Standard&quot; in choosing a Lawyer.  This &quot;Lawyer&quot; is a front for Organized Crime and stole thousand and thousands from me.  When I retained another law Firm to go after the stolen funds; I was met with written death threats!

I have sent Martindale-Hubble three letters and no response and this Law Firm is still on their site and still has a good rating.

I have found other victims and am considering the liability and the posture indifference Martindale-Hubble has seemingly taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used the Martindale-Hubble reputation as the Gold Standard&#8221; in choosing a Lawyer.  This &#8220;Lawyer&#8221; is a front for Organized Crime and stole thousand and thousands from me.  When I retained another law Firm to go after the stolen funds; I was met with written death threats!</p>
<p>I have sent Martindale-Hubble three letters and no response and this Law Firm is still on their site and still has a good rating.</p>
<p>I have found other victims and am considering the liability and the posture indifference Martindale-Hubble has seemingly taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Compliance Building &#183; Martindale- Hubbell Connected Opens Its Barn Door</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/03/21/martindale-hubble-connected-my-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Compliance Building &#183; Martindale- Hubbell Connected Opens Its Barn Door</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=1960#comment-389</guid>
		<description>[...] manage to sneak into the site several months ago and finally posted Martindale-Hubbell Connected - My Thoughts last weekend. Several other commenters have offered some harsh opinions about the site for locking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] manage to sneak into the site several months ago and finally posted Martindale-Hubbell Connected &#8211; My Thoughts last weekend. Several other commenters have offered some harsh opinions about the site for locking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Campbell&#8217;s Web Log &#187; Martindale Hubbell Blown to Bits?</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/03/21/martindale-hubble-connected-my-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Campbell&#8217;s Web Log &#187; Martindale Hubbell Blown to Bits?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=1960#comment-238</guid>
		<description>[...] Martindale-Hubbell Connected - My Thoughts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Martindale-Hubbell Connected &#8211; My Thoughts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/03/21/martindale-hubble-connected-my-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=1960#comment-228</guid>
		<description>Kathleen -

I see some benefits to the gated community.

One of the reasons I am skeptical of using the Martindale database to authenticate is that Connected will be open to some non-lawyers. You have to let in the marketing people to help update and manage profiles. (Obviously, it would be better to have the attorneys do it themselves. That is unlikely to be the case for the vast majority of lawyers for a long time.) Where do you draw the line for keeping out non-lawyers and non-practicing lawyers?

The other problem is that the Martindale database is just not that accurate. It&#039;s not Martindale&#039;s fault. But firms just have not been keeping on top of their martindale listings. (I see that the listings from my old firm are not accurate. Lots of departed people are still listed.)

I continue to participate in the Connected community and wrote this post because I see the potential. I am just waiting for some of that potential to come to fruition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen -</p>
<p>I see some benefits to the gated community.</p>
<p>One of the reasons I am skeptical of using the Martindale database to authenticate is that Connected will be open to some non-lawyers. You have to let in the marketing people to help update and manage profiles. (Obviously, it would be better to have the attorneys do it themselves. That is unlikely to be the case for the vast majority of lawyers for a long time.) Where do you draw the line for keeping out non-lawyers and non-practicing lawyers?</p>
<p>The other problem is that the Martindale database is just not that accurate. It&#8217;s not Martindale&#8217;s fault. But firms just have not been keeping on top of their martindale listings. (I see that the listings from my old firm are not accurate. Lots of departed people are still listed.)</p>
<p>I continue to participate in the Connected community and wrote this post because I see the potential. I am just waiting for some of that potential to come to fruition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen Delaney</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/03/21/martindale-hubble-connected-my-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Delaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=1960#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Doug, 

As always, thanks for the feedback and we do appreciate how active you have been with your peers in MH Connected.  You are an early adopter and we are lucky to have your input.

I just want to clarify one point you made, the &#039;gated community&#039; is something that corporate counsel and other lawyers specifically asked us for in a network. And as we&#039;ve developed Martindale-Hubbell Connected, they&#039;ve told us they want other legal professionals join them. So, in opening the network later this summer, we&#039;re not &quot;conceding&quot; anything, but rather responding to the specific needs of our users. 

We hope to give folks the best of both worlds, and that&#039;s why we value our relationship with LinkedIn, showing members their whole network in one glance. 

As you said, we have &quot;the resources and the goldmine of information to make Connected a success&quot;.  And know that there is a strong and dedicated team in place to make this a reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, </p>
<p>As always, thanks for the feedback and we do appreciate how active you have been with your peers in MH Connected.  You are an early adopter and we are lucky to have your input.</p>
<p>I just want to clarify one point you made, the &#8216;gated community&#8217; is something that corporate counsel and other lawyers specifically asked us for in a network. And as we&#8217;ve developed Martindale-Hubbell Connected, they&#8217;ve told us they want other legal professionals join them. So, in opening the network later this summer, we&#8217;re not &#8220;conceding&#8221; anything, but rather responding to the specific needs of our users. </p>
<p>We hope to give folks the best of both worlds, and that&#8217;s why we value our relationship with LinkedIn, showing members their whole network in one glance. </p>
<p>As you said, we have &#8220;the resources and the goldmine of information to make Connected a success&#8221;.  And know that there is a strong and dedicated team in place to make this a reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/03/21/martindale-hubble-connected-my-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=1960#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Toby -

I would guess that Martindale has seen some of these problems coming. I assume Connected is the result.

As a young associate, Martindale.com was a wonderful resource. You could easily find information on opposing counsel. I faded into the background as law firms started putting their attorney listings on line. Until I heard about Connected, I had not been to Martindale in years. But the target audience is in-house counsel, not law firms.

Martindale, as a subsidiary of Lexis, has the resources and the goldmine of information to make Connected a success. It is just a matter of execution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toby -</p>
<p>I would guess that Martindale has seen some of these problems coming. I assume Connected is the result.</p>
<p>As a young associate, Martindale.com was a wonderful resource. You could easily find information on opposing counsel. I faded into the background as law firms started putting their attorney listings on line. Until I heard about Connected, I had not been to Martindale in years. But the target audience is in-house counsel, not law firms.</p>
<p>Martindale, as a subsidiary of Lexis, has the resources and the goldmine of information to make Connected a success. It is just a matter of execution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/03/21/martindale-hubble-connected-my-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compliancebuilding.com/?p=1960#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Although MH sits on a goldmine of information, I think it&#039;s in serious trouble.  With firms looking to cut non-essential costs, over the next year as MH contracts come due, I predict a major exodus.  Frankly I&#039;ve just don&#039;t see the value in MH.  Years ago an AV rating may have brought some work in the door.  Not today - or at least not much. With so many emerging options that demonstrate ROI, MH is going down (IMHO).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although MH sits on a goldmine of information, I think it&#8217;s in serious trouble.  With firms looking to cut non-essential costs, over the next year as MH contracts come due, I predict a major exodus.  Frankly I&#8217;ve just don&#8217;t see the value in MH.  Years ago an AV rating may have brought some work in the door.  Not today &#8211; or at least not much. With so many emerging options that demonstrate ROI, MH is going down (IMHO).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
